Thursday, December 10, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
two memorable moments from my short practicum
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Math Poem Reflection
Division by Zero Poem
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Kinemalgebratics microteaching reflection
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Microteaching BOOPPPS Lesson Plan
BRIDGE:Today in Math we are going to be doing an activity involving a ball and measurements!
TEACHER OBJECTIVES:To teach algebra implicitly using a Kinematics Lab.
STUDENT OBJECTIVES:Basic understanding of algebra and the ability to apply it to real world situations involving simple kinematics (v=d/t).
PRE-TEST:Intentionally none done, as we don't want to "tip our hat".
PARTICIPATION:Two tables.
1)The first table is a "Kinematics Shout-Out", where the students derive the basic Kinematics equations and put them in algebraic notation. We will be using the equation v=d/t and solving for the variables v, d, t using repetition.
2)The second table is a "Mini-Lab" with a ball rolling a set distance against a wall. The students will measure the distance from a line to the wall, and measure the time it takes the ball to get to the wall. This will then later be applied to the equation learned previously.
Required Materials:
- Masking tape
- Measuring tape
- Stop watches
- Balls
POST-TEST:Students will use their measurements and their new equations to calculate the speeds that the balls were rolling using v=d/t
SUMMARY:Surprise... you just learned algebra!
Write down the equation you learned and how you could apply this to another real life situation for next class.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Citizenship and the Mathematics Classroom
This was a very interesting article about mathematics and the attempt to include citizenship in mathematics education. I found it intriguing to note that the author follows a similar train of thought that we have been learning throughout the course. That is, that we should not just teach optimal ways of finding ‘right’ answers to problems, but that we should provide them with a deeper understanding. This deeper understanding will help student’s function better in society. I had not ever thought of the fact that homework and having right and wrong answers may not be good for citizenship education. I thought the author brought up an interesting point, that by doing this, we are judging a students’ thought process and not giving them the right to be freely creative in their thought process. After reading this article I can only hope that I can take aspects of these points and use them in my own classroom. From as far as I can remember, I have never really been given the opportunity to be entirely free and creative when doing math. There has always been the underlying right and wrong answer that has affected the way I think about math. I also liked the suggestion to “build community in the classroom” (Simmt, 5) by making sure students contribute in the classroom. I feel this is a very important point because student participation will encourage other students to become active participants in mathematics. I really appreciate how this article has tried to incorporate citizenship in the mathematics classroom, and provides the reader with ways to do this. It is definitely an aspect I have never really thought much about before, but I will certainly consider from now on.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
What-If-Not?
The What-If-Not method is a very interesting technique using a sequence of levels starting with choosing a topic/starting point, listing attributes of that topic, choosing an attribute and thinking What-If-Not, posing a problem and then analyzing that problem. I feel that this may be difficult to use for our microteaching lesson, mainly because we have created a very real-life application approach to our lesson plan. I think that to use the What-If-Not technique we will have to make our topic (algebra) more specific to begin the process. If we did so, we could generate some characteristics about algebra before the lesson, or even have our students generate or add some characteristics they know about algebra during the lesson. This would create a great base for understanding this topic. I think if we were able to create some What-If-Not statements it may also help to explore the topic, and allow students to get creative and work collectively as a group.
Some strengths of this approach are:
1) It really allows students, or even instructors to start thinking of aspects or attributes of their topic they may not have thought of before. This allows someone to be more creative within the math classroom, something that is often taken for granted.
2) This What-If-Not part of this approach is great because it creates a deeper understanding of the topic, and allows the instructor or whoever is using this method, to generate or pose many more problems than they normally would.
Some weaknesses of this approach:
1)I think the main weakness of this approach is that it seems very extensive. There are a lot of steps that involve a lot of time. Although it points to towards a deeper understanding of the topic, I am not sure whether the amount of time spent generating these types of problems would be a benefit in the end.
2)I also felt that delving into the What-If-Not’s might be confusing for some students. Many people have a “math phobia” and I think that this could be potentially confusing for many students and put them off math even further.
I think with lots of practice and more extensive knowledge of this approach, it could be useful in the classroom to spark interest and go into a deeper meaning of some topics.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
10 Questions to the authors of 'The Art of Problem Posing'
1) I would like to know why the authors feel that after we solve a problem we don’t understand the significance of what we have done. Could they provide an example of this?
2) I would like to ask the authors how or what ideas they changed in their book for the third edition? It would be interesting to see how their approach to problem posing has changed over the years.
3) The Secular Talmund is something I have never heard of and I would be interested in finding out how they came to know this idea and have a little more information on what it is about.
4) I found the fist chapter interesting from the point of view of the first question asked. You could see the difference between the more simple to more complicated and relational thinking, making it more clear how we can begin to improve on problem posing.
5) I would like to know why, when asking a question about isosceles triangles, those with ‘weak’ skills or knowledge come up with more robust questions?
6) I was unclear about the discussion on ‘challenging’ the given’. Why would you not accept something like a geoboard as is? How would you change it?
7) I liked how the authors used observations to create or pose new problems. This seems like a useful tool, make observations about what you are looking at and only then begin to pose problems.
8) Does the author find that by posing a problem that requires an approximate answer, the problem solver becomes more creative?
9) I thought it was interesting that the authors suggested inquiring about the history of some of the problems. This seems like a great way to become more familiar with the concepts and be able to have a better knowledge base for posing problems.
10) I would like to ask the authors for more examples of internal vs. external exploration. I was a little unclear how to go begin exploring this way in terms of mathematics concepts.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Letters from future students
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Reflection of "Teaching the Marked Case" video
Teaching the marked case was a very interesting video. For a while in many of our classes we have discussed engaging the students and using a relational understanding teaching method. We have not however had the chance to see it in action. I thought that seeing someone teach using a relational method was very helpful. As a colleague mentioned in class, the instructor on the video was able cover more than one topic using his method. This would be very helpful on a tight curricular schedule. I thought that it also gave the students a great way of understanding how the math they were learning worked. By the repetition and having students speak out loud I think that they would have a better chance of remembering the concepts they were being taught. I did however have some concerns on the lack of notes. If the students have nothing to look back on, how are they to remember what went on months ago? Perhaps this teacher gave notes after his initial lesson. As well, I feel that it would be important for the students to have a step-by-step method written down for them to practice which I did not see performed in the video. I did, however, like how engaged the students in the video were and how many participated without fear of being wrong. During the video it was also interesting to noticed how well managed the classroom was, so this is definitely a great aspect of this method. I think that the marked case method has many positive features but could be used along with a more instrumental way of teaching to create and an even more effective lesson.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Summary and Comments on Battleground Schools
The view on mathematics education has varied between two politically linked ideas since the 1900’s. The Progressive viewpoint focuses on a deeper level of understanding of mathematics by both the student and teacher. It encourages teachers to take a lesser role and allow the students to take up more of the learning process. The Conservative viewpoint focuses on teachers lecturing and students listening and copying notes rather than stimulating a deeper meaning of the content they are learning.
The negative view of mathematics by parents, elementary teachers and teachers using the conservative method of teaching math have fueled three reform movements in mathematics: “Progressivist reform, the New Math and the Standards-based Math Wars”. (395)
The Progressivist Reform in the early 1900’s focused on creating teachers who not only taught students how to achieve answers but also why the methods they used gave these answers. It focused on involving the students in their learning rather than the common lecture method so as to create students who would become individual thinkers rather than followers.
The New Math era of the 1960’s followed on the heels of the Cold war when competition with other nations became prevalent. The New Math created by the SMSG, upon the anxieties of politicians, resulted in a curriculum stemming from university mathematics that many teachers and parents at the time knew nothing about. The goal of this era was to create scientists and mathematicians without regard to those who may have not been interested.
The Math Wars beginning in the 1990’s were battles between those we did and did not agree with the standards put in place in the school system by the NCTM. When the TIMSS published their results comparing educational levels across different countries, opinions over who’s teaching methods worked better surfaced and the battle continues today.
I was very interested to see that mathematics has been so political for so long. It is interesting to see where our current curriculum stems from and where these ideas got their start. I found that the Progressivist Reform is similar to what we as teacher candidates are experiencing now. Our idea of lecturing and only teaching the how not the why is being challenged as we speak, similarly to the movement that occurred in the early to mid 1900’s. I find it slightly upsetting that the New Math era really focused on creating students that would become adults that would rival other nations in scientific and mathematic knowledge. It seems that no thought went into the students well being and only what would benefit the politicians and make their country look good. I really feel that there may be no end to the Math Wars that are continuing on today. There are too many people with a vast array of opinions that have a say in the math curriculum today for anything to be resolved in a short amount of time.
Personal Response to Interview
When we fist began this assignment I really wanted to gain an understanding of what it is like to be a math teacher and how students feel about math in general.
Mr.Y gave us answers above and beyond what I was expecting hear. I found his response about how to engage students with low motivation particularly interesting. I have always felt that I as a teacher I would want to show students that math is fun and exciting but Mr. Y made me re-evaluate at which times I should use this enthusiasm. Perhaps because there are so many students in our schools who have a math phobia I should be careful how I place this enthusiasm about math in the classroom. Keeping an open mind and explaining to students who aren’t highly motivated that I understand that math is difficult and not always exciting may be the proper way to approach these situations.
I found Mr. Y’s tip about making use of colleagues AND students to be highly interesting. From this I realized that using brighter students to assist those who are having difficulties is not only a way to vary explanations but also a way to have students actively engaged in the classroom. This is something we are constantly being asked to strive for in the teacher education program.
I highly appreciate the answers our student provided to our questions. I found it interesting that the student we interviewed felt she would prefer to work alone rather than participate in group activities. This was really the opposite answer I was expecting.
I wish we had all had the chance to speak with Sam’s sister and some other students about our questions to get a more in depth look at how a student views math.
I enjoyed hearing some of the other questions that were asked to both students and teachers in class on Friday. One group asked a question about whether students should have homework and how much, to both teachers and students. I believe homework is important as and educator and I was surprised that most of the students interviewed in that group felt so as well. I also found it interesting how the answer to this question varied so much in the teacher responses. It really shows you how each person takes their own personality and ideas into the classroom. Another group asked for tips to make the classroom more engaging and one teacher responded that we should act as a discussion leader and have the students to teach themselves. I have been having some doubts about this method, which has been so frequently referred to by all of our instructors, so I found it encouraging knowing that there are teachers in the school system who are using it. I really hope that I will be able to incorporate this style into my own teaching style in the future.
Group Summary of Interview
In order to have our entire group participate in a face-to-face interview with a math instructor we chose someone who was a previous high school math teacher, Mr, Y. He worked in Trail BC, Burnaby as well as a correctional facility. We were able to gain some valuable information from a great 45 minute interview. This is what we found out.
Teacher Questions
TQ1) What did you find to be your biggest challenges with your early teaching experiences?
Mr. Y found that classroom management was his biggest challenge. He struggled with getting upset with his students and felt that he could simply work around the chatter rather than clamping down it. He realized later in his teacher career that this was NOT the way to go about things. He explained to us that to overcome this obstacle we should make our expectations as clear as possible so students know what is acceptable in the classroom.
TQ2) What accommodations have you made to help students with learning difficulties?
Mr. Y had experience working at Burnaby South, which worked in conjunction with the BC school for the deaf. Having someone shadow him to sign or repeat what he was saying made him realize how fast he spoke and how important it is to work on your pacing. He said he would have liked to have had more experience with severe ESL students. His tip was to be patient, and mindful of student experiences and histories because “their problems usually have nothing to do with you.” One particular example our group found memorable was Mr. Y’s story of a young boy he taught who seemed to just hate him and wanted nothing to do with his class. It ended up that this boy had an abusive father of the same nationality as Mr. Y and so the association was negative thus showing us that we can’t take everything personally in this job.
TQ3) How do you engage students with low motivation?
Mr. Y answered this question quickly and simply, “Humour can break down barriers”. Having a sense of humour seems to be key to having a class that will respond to you. He also feels that it is important to acknowledge that math is not everyone’s favourite subject and we should not go into a class with the attitude that we think math is the most interesting subject in the world and we are going to make them absolutely love our class right off the bat. He stressed that the main goal for students with low motivation is to get them to simply come to class and to do this we should take an interest in what they are interested in and teach to their level of understanding.
TQ4) How do you vary your topics/explanations when students have difficulty understanding?
Jokingly he began with “Slower and Louder”, but he later explained it comes with experience. Mr. Y said that because of the curriculum, it is not always possible to find many different ways to explain things so everyone can understand. He suggested making use of your colleagues, they may have an alternative way of explaining a topic. Mr. Y also made an interesting suggestion, to use the brighter students in the class as they may have solved a problem in a way you didn’t think of that is easier for a student having trouble to understand.
TQ5) What do you enjoy most about teaching? Least?
Mr. Y explained to us that interactions with the kids he taught was the most and least enjoyable thing about teaching. He said that forming relationships with them and watching them grow is amazing, however it is difficult to watch them leave and move to new phases of their lives. He also does not like the ways certain topics are presented in the curriculum as well as the fact that the curriculum is sometimes unbalanced throughout the grade levels. One positive thing he said that our group found humourous was that he enjoyed having less marking than teachers of other subject areas.
Our group also developed five separate questions to ask a student. Sam interviewed one of his sisters who is in grade 10 math.
Sister #4 interview
SQ1) Why do you think it’s important to teach math in school?
This seemed to be a difficult question to answer and may have ended up being an answer that she felt she was supposed to give. Sister #4 said that math is important for future life and many careers. Interestingly she also said that it is important as it helps to develop ‘reasoning power’.
SQ2) How do you develop your first impressions of a teacher?
Our student bases her opinion mainly on humour as well as the organiztion of the classroom. She feels that the more organized a teacher is indicates strictness whereas a less organized teacher indicates a more relaxed teacher.
SQ3) Think of a math lesson that you found particularly memorable. What made it unique?
In grade 7 our student had a class that was instructed by a student teacher. When they learned about Pi the teacher came to school dressed as a chef and brought them apple pie. This indicated to us that she really didn’t remember the actual lesson about Pi, just that it was a fun class because they got to eat apple pie!
SQ4) How would you feel about incorporating more group activities in Math class?
Initially the student had a negative reaction to this idea and said she prefers to work alone. She said that explanations from other students usually just add to the confusion of her learning. She did however find the idea of group projects appealing.
SQ5) What is a memorable, effective way that a teacher has helped you to understand a tricky concept.
In grade 8 our student had a math teacher who explained equation solving using a unique analogy involving negatives being bad and getting sent to the basement until they come out positive on the other side. An interesting concept.
Our group found that Mr.Y's responses to our questions gave us some interesting tips and ideas that we can be aware of and use for our future career as educators. Our student interview gave us an unique insight into the mind of a math student.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Reflection on the Article 'Using Research to Analyze, Inform, and Assess Changes in Instruction' by Heather Robinson
I really enjoyed Robinson’s article, she provided some good hard evidence to back up everything we have been learning about engaging students rather than lecturing to them.
One point of the article I found intriguing was that as a teacher, Robinson had followed the curriculum and textbooks and had students that did very well on assignments and tests in the classroom. What I found surprising was, that when it came time to take the final exam, even the students who excelled in the class failed them. This example really shows that as a teacher you have to go above and beyond simple lectures and begin to engage and involve students in what you are teaching them.
I also enjoyed seeing the differences between exam questions Robinson used from her old style of teaching and new style. I found it interesting to see that her style changed from simple, find the answer questions, to ones that had the students explain, describe and provide more information than just a numerical answer. I found this comparison very useful and I can see from the two styles how one will have students reflecting on the knowledge they have learned rather that just memorizing a simple formula.
Robinson also used the Think-Pair-Share idea we have been learning about in our class studies. I have been curious as to how you might use this in a math class setting and Robinson provided some great examples of how she used this technique in her own classroom.
I found the Jigsaw approach discussed in this article so neat and exciting! Who would have thought of having students become responsible for their own learning as a “topic expert” within a group and the teacher simply acting as a facilitator? I have never thought of teaching a math class that way because I have never experienced that in my own educational experiences with math. The positive implications of this method seem to be numberless, and I would be excited to try this method in my own classroom.
I found this article to be extremely helpful and motivating towards my own career as an educator. I really found it useful to see the positive change in students’ learning from a change in style of teaching by their instructor. I plan to keep this article and hopefully use some of the ideas and tips it has provided me for my future teaching career.
Reflection of My Two Most Memorable Teachers
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Reflection of Microteaching Lesson
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Microteaching Lesson Plan
Microteaching Lesson Plan
1.)Bridge- Show class my disk (Frisbee) and ask them if they have heard of the game Ultimate Frisbee.
2.) Teaching Objectives- To have the students working together and being involved in a participatory activity.
To develop the students Frisbee throwing skills.
3.) Learning Objectives- Students will be able to throw a disk in three different ways, a)backhand
b)forehand
c)hammer throws
using the proper wrist and arm mechanics.
Students will learn when it is appropriate to use each of these throws in the game of Ultimate Frisbee.
4.) Pretest- Has anyone ever thrown a disk before?
Do you know the three main types of tosses?
5.) Participatory- Each student will receive a disc.
-As a group I will demonstrate the techniques of a particular throw and explain when to use it in a game setting. (backhand, forehand, hammer)
-I will then have the students repeat or show me the technique I have just taught them.
-Students will then partner up and use one disc to practice tossing the particular throw to each other.
-I will repeat these steps with the other types of throws.
-If some students already know a particular throw we can improve on their techniques and those students knowledgeable can assist those students who don’t know the skill.
6.) Post Test- What are the names of the three throws we learned today?
Give me a short demonstration of what each throw looks like and when to use it.
7.) Summary-Today we have learned a backhand, forehand and hammer throw with a Frisbee, and know when to use them in the game.
Next time we may improve on our technique and simulate a game setting to practice our three throws.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Skemp Article Commentary
The article Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding brought forth many new ideas about the way I was previously taught and the way I may have taught math. I recall in high school frequently being told to just use what I was given and not try to understand why things worked in class, so as not to become confused. After reading this article I have begun to re-evaluate the way I may want to teach a math class and to give more thought to instrumental and relational understanding. I have chosen some quotes from his article that I found particularly interesting or insightful to discuss.
The first quotation “Instrumental understanding I would until recently not have regarded as understanding at all” (Skemp 2), I found surprising that someone would completely admonish one form of teaching over the other. While I have begun to think relational understanding may have more importance I believe that the two of them can be used together to teach effectively.
The next quotation I chose was, “there are two kinds of mathematical mis-matches which can occur. 1. Pupils whose goal is to understand instrumentally, taught by a teacher who wants them to understand relationally. 2. The other way about” (Skemp 4). These mis-matches made me think that, as teachers, we need to remember that every child learns differently. In order to effectively reach most of our students we should perhaps focus on using both types of understanding, instead of choosing one over the other, to try to avoid theses mis-matches.
The third quotation says, “I now believe there are two effectively different subjects being taught under the same name, ‘mathematics’” (Skemp 6). I found this quote hard to agree with, maybe because I am not as familiar or have not had as much time to think about the two types of understanding. It is an interesting idea, but as of now I am leaning towards seeing them as different teaching styles that we must learn to use and not actual subjects.
I found the next quote “Relational Knowledge can be effective as a goal in itself” (Skemp 10), and its subsequent explanation to be an exciting prospect. If this form of understanding can be self-motivating to the student, math can become more enjoyable to them and we as teachers can be more successful in our jobs. I would be interested in seeing how motivational or exactly what effects relational knowledge can have on a student or classroom.
The last quote I have chosen is “learning relational mathematics…can produce an unlimited number of plans for getting from any starting point within his schema to any finishing point” (Skemp 14). I felt these words to be inspiring. As a future teacher, by using relational understanding, I could provide my students with the tools to rely less on me and allow them to have a more in depth knowledge of what they are learning. I find it very interesting that this one type of understanding has the possibility to provide a student with an actual in depth understanding of their subject instead of memorization of formulas.
I thoroughly enjoyed this article and how it made me evaluate the way I have taught mathematics and how I can improve on them in the future. I will definitely try to incorporate both of the methods of understanding into my practice and learn more about relational understanding, which I am less familiar with.
References
1. Skemp, R.R.. “Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding.”First published in Mathematics Teaching 77 (1976) : 20-26