Sunday, October 18, 2009
Math Poem Reflection
Division by Zero Poem
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Kinemalgebratics microteaching reflection
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Microteaching BOOPPPS Lesson Plan
BRIDGE:Today in Math we are going to be doing an activity involving a ball and measurements!
TEACHER OBJECTIVES:To teach algebra implicitly using a Kinematics Lab.
STUDENT OBJECTIVES:Basic understanding of algebra and the ability to apply it to real world situations involving simple kinematics (v=d/t).
PRE-TEST:Intentionally none done, as we don't want to "tip our hat".
PARTICIPATION:Two tables.
1)The first table is a "Kinematics Shout-Out", where the students derive the basic Kinematics equations and put them in algebraic notation. We will be using the equation v=d/t and solving for the variables v, d, t using repetition.
2)The second table is a "Mini-Lab" with a ball rolling a set distance against a wall. The students will measure the distance from a line to the wall, and measure the time it takes the ball to get to the wall. This will then later be applied to the equation learned previously.
Required Materials:
- Masking tape
- Measuring tape
- Stop watches
- Balls
POST-TEST:Students will use their measurements and their new equations to calculate the speeds that the balls were rolling using v=d/t
SUMMARY:Surprise... you just learned algebra!
Write down the equation you learned and how you could apply this to another real life situation for next class.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Citizenship and the Mathematics Classroom
This was a very interesting article about mathematics and the attempt to include citizenship in mathematics education. I found it intriguing to note that the author follows a similar train of thought that we have been learning throughout the course. That is, that we should not just teach optimal ways of finding ‘right’ answers to problems, but that we should provide them with a deeper understanding. This deeper understanding will help student’s function better in society. I had not ever thought of the fact that homework and having right and wrong answers may not be good for citizenship education. I thought the author brought up an interesting point, that by doing this, we are judging a students’ thought process and not giving them the right to be freely creative in their thought process. After reading this article I can only hope that I can take aspects of these points and use them in my own classroom. From as far as I can remember, I have never really been given the opportunity to be entirely free and creative when doing math. There has always been the underlying right and wrong answer that has affected the way I think about math. I also liked the suggestion to “build community in the classroom” (Simmt, 5) by making sure students contribute in the classroom. I feel this is a very important point because student participation will encourage other students to become active participants in mathematics. I really appreciate how this article has tried to incorporate citizenship in the mathematics classroom, and provides the reader with ways to do this. It is definitely an aspect I have never really thought much about before, but I will certainly consider from now on.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
What-If-Not?
The What-If-Not method is a very interesting technique using a sequence of levels starting with choosing a topic/starting point, listing attributes of that topic, choosing an attribute and thinking What-If-Not, posing a problem and then analyzing that problem. I feel that this may be difficult to use for our microteaching lesson, mainly because we have created a very real-life application approach to our lesson plan. I think that to use the What-If-Not technique we will have to make our topic (algebra) more specific to begin the process. If we did so, we could generate some characteristics about algebra before the lesson, or even have our students generate or add some characteristics they know about algebra during the lesson. This would create a great base for understanding this topic. I think if we were able to create some What-If-Not statements it may also help to explore the topic, and allow students to get creative and work collectively as a group.
Some strengths of this approach are:
1) It really allows students, or even instructors to start thinking of aspects or attributes of their topic they may not have thought of before. This allows someone to be more creative within the math classroom, something that is often taken for granted.
2) This What-If-Not part of this approach is great because it creates a deeper understanding of the topic, and allows the instructor or whoever is using this method, to generate or pose many more problems than they normally would.
Some weaknesses of this approach:
1)I think the main weakness of this approach is that it seems very extensive. There are a lot of steps that involve a lot of time. Although it points to towards a deeper understanding of the topic, I am not sure whether the amount of time spent generating these types of problems would be a benefit in the end.
2)I also felt that delving into the What-If-Not’s might be confusing for some students. Many people have a “math phobia” and I think that this could be potentially confusing for many students and put them off math even further.
I think with lots of practice and more extensive knowledge of this approach, it could be useful in the classroom to spark interest and go into a deeper meaning of some topics.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
10 Questions to the authors of 'The Art of Problem Posing'
1) I would like to know why the authors feel that after we solve a problem we don’t understand the significance of what we have done. Could they provide an example of this?
2) I would like to ask the authors how or what ideas they changed in their book for the third edition? It would be interesting to see how their approach to problem posing has changed over the years.
3) The Secular Talmund is something I have never heard of and I would be interested in finding out how they came to know this idea and have a little more information on what it is about.
4) I found the fist chapter interesting from the point of view of the first question asked. You could see the difference between the more simple to more complicated and relational thinking, making it more clear how we can begin to improve on problem posing.
5) I would like to know why, when asking a question about isosceles triangles, those with ‘weak’ skills or knowledge come up with more robust questions?
6) I was unclear about the discussion on ‘challenging’ the given’. Why would you not accept something like a geoboard as is? How would you change it?
7) I liked how the authors used observations to create or pose new problems. This seems like a useful tool, make observations about what you are looking at and only then begin to pose problems.
8) Does the author find that by posing a problem that requires an approximate answer, the problem solver becomes more creative?
9) I thought it was interesting that the authors suggested inquiring about the history of some of the problems. This seems like a great way to become more familiar with the concepts and be able to have a better knowledge base for posing problems.
10) I would like to ask the authors for more examples of internal vs. external exploration. I was a little unclear how to go begin exploring this way in terms of mathematics concepts.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Letters from future students
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Reflection of "Teaching the Marked Case" video
Teaching the marked case was a very interesting video. For a while in many of our classes we have discussed engaging the students and using a relational understanding teaching method. We have not however had the chance to see it in action. I thought that seeing someone teach using a relational method was very helpful. As a colleague mentioned in class, the instructor on the video was able cover more than one topic using his method. This would be very helpful on a tight curricular schedule. I thought that it also gave the students a great way of understanding how the math they were learning worked. By the repetition and having students speak out loud I think that they would have a better chance of remembering the concepts they were being taught. I did however have some concerns on the lack of notes. If the students have nothing to look back on, how are they to remember what went on months ago? Perhaps this teacher gave notes after his initial lesson. As well, I feel that it would be important for the students to have a step-by-step method written down for them to practice which I did not see performed in the video. I did, however, like how engaged the students in the video were and how many participated without fear of being wrong. During the video it was also interesting to noticed how well managed the classroom was, so this is definitely a great aspect of this method. I think that the marked case method has many positive features but could be used along with a more instrumental way of teaching to create and an even more effective lesson.